Genocide and Murder vs. Torture.

Recently released memos outlining the enhanced interrogation techniques employed during the Bush administration in the war against Islamic terror, (according to some) seems to infer moral superiority upon those who disagree with these techniques and who now have branded them as torture. (The likes of Nancy Pelosi and others, who are now playing the "guess what I knew and when I knew it game" comes to mind.)

These secular minions of socialist idolatry, are quite comfortable representing the hypocrisy of their own moral degeneracy, as something completely mortally right and above all reproach. And the media is eager to carry water for them.

Yet in doing so, they are forced to ignore and deny all else that is clearly present and going on in the world today as it concerns real torture and murder. And they do it in order to stand on their oasis of supposed morality. Open acts of genocide, murder and homicidal terrorism. All of which regularly screams against their idiotic socialist reasoning, and argues in the face of their abject hypocrisy, is occurring daily in these very countries that they seek to utilize in their attempts to vilify America.

These social moralist are the first to assert that America cannot possess or wear any mantle of moral authority, as long as it allows and provides for the torture of its enemies or those it has identified as threats to its safety.

Yet who is kidding who when it comes to the differentiation between murder, genocide and torture? And who is involved in precisely what once the bigger picture is examined. There are those who will continue to vilify America for any act of self defense or prosecution of those responsible for the deaths or planned deaths of Americans, regardless of circumstance.

Yet to do so, these self appointed self righteous proselytizers of socialist anti American dogma and nihilist relativism, must openly ignore and step over the countless examples that fly in the face of their purposely misrepresented and lying relativism.

These practitioners of liberal angst morality are the first to cite the supposed horrors of Abu Graib and Guantanamo and they are equally fast to challenge all enhanced interrogation techniques as nothing less than abject barbaric torture. Yet in attempting to claim the moral high ground, they purposely overlook all that is evident of the need for such tactics in any sensible western defense against Islamic militancy and terrorism globally. In essence, they can't have it both ways, but that is the only way that their arguments make sense to them.

There is quite a difference of reality and an equally large leap of skewed perception, any time anyone can judge water boarding and sleep deprivation as torture. Especially when it is compared directly to or of the same equality of category as immolation, beheading, the gouging out of eyes and amputation of limbs. Much less the regular use of castration and rape as middle eastern and Muslim tools of interrogation.

Or the abject execution of people in mass, simply because they are from a different sect or tribe and they don't adhere to the dogma of Islamic militancy or the flavor of Islam that their murderers and executioners do.

Yet what I have described goes on almost daily in the middle east and in Islamic fundamentalist nations all across Africa and Malaysia. And no one in these western enclaves of liberal media morality seems to care. The least of which being those who ride their socialist and anti American nihilist sacred cows into the town squares of our culture and attack Americans as the only real barbarians and heathens compared to the practitioners of the supposed religion of peace.

If you have the stomach for it......have a look at how peace and love was recently practiced by those in Gaza. Against those who do not share their Islamic militancy.

Video

It's a minute and 5 seconds in the lives of Hamas and those who support them. But more importantly, it is the last minute and five seconds of the lives of those who didn't. In 65 seconds, the lives of approximately eighteen people were viciously and wantonly ended by Muslim fanaticism.

Where was/is the moral indignation of western media over this act or the countless similar acts that occur regularly in the middle east, Gaza, the Sudan or Malaysia. And what about what is presently occurring in Sri Lanka daily.

I am sorry, but I don't buy into liberal political angst and its faux moral indignation. Condemning America for having defended itself against wanton and savage attacks and against the plotting of the same and similar with bogus claims of torture and violations of human rights? Just doesn't reach my sensibilities over flow valve. Although the stench of the lies of those who would like to have me believe differently, regularly stings my sensibilities and cause me to wretch.

War is a nasty business and those that believe that there are differentiations between legal and illegal wars are not only spewing oxymorons, but they are themselves morons in my opinion.

General William T Sherman was the man who coined the phrase that war is hell. Later, John Stuart Mill added" "War is an ugly thing, but not the ugliest of things. The decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feeling which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse. The person who has nothing for which he is willing to fight, nothing which is more important than his own personal safety, is a miserable creature and has no chance of being free unless made and kept so by the exertions of better men than himself.

Presently, the efforts of better men is all that stands between the west and anarchy. And at the worst? A global Islamic jihad of a magnitude never before imagined. And that jihad is present underway IMO.

And it makes very little difference to those who occupy the sanctimonious ground of liberal elitism and secular atheism and whether they believe in Christianity or Islam. As the disparate ideologies have already been declared and the battle lines have been set globally. All that remains to be determined at this point, is who has the wherewithal to withstand the long and protracted battles that will continue to be forced upon us.

After which, the only real question that needs be asked and answer individually? Is which team do you want to be part of. The living? Or the soon to be dead?