Amazing. When a republican president commits US troops to war in Afghanistan and Iraq with congressional approval, to go after avowed enemies of this nation and those responsible for killing over 3000 Americans on September 11 2001? Some how according to the liberal democrats, he is a war monger and a liar and someone pursuing an agenda of blood for oil with his big oil cronies.
Yet when a democrat president commits US troops to a war in Libya, without congressional approval, then thumbs his nose at congress over his authority tom do it and there is no clear cut need for American intervention there period? Then somehow he is just and it is unconscionable for congress not to unquestionably support him in his endeavors.
Anyone notice? That the oil in danger in Libya is the main source of oil for much of Europe? Never mind. I suppose that Texas oil men are the only rel evil ones on the planet. Certainly not the Europeans. And here's Hillary as his cheerleader.
U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton is questioning the priorities of lawmakers criticizing the U.S. intervention in Libya.
She's asking bluntly, "Whose side are you on?"
Setting up a showdown on Libya, House Republicans agreed Wednesday to vote on dueling measures, one to give President Barack Obama limited authority to continue U.S. involvement in the NATO-led operation against Moammar Gadhafi and the other to cut off funds for military hostilities.
The measures reflect widespread dissatisfaction with Obama's decision not to seek congressional consent for the 3-month-old war.
Clinton says Congress is free to raise objections but questions the priorities of the critics. She says the Obama administration and its partners are rightly siding with the Libyan people.
She spoke about Libya during a brief stop in Jamaica.
No comments:
Post a Comment