A Conspiracy of Appeasement

Having read the early morning shocker (Obama wins Nobel), I wrote an initial blog of my thoughts and reaction and then I went about my day and routine. I was intermittently listening to talk radio and all the while mulling what all this represents in the bigger picture.

I must confess a deep seated immediate anger that I had not seen this announcement coming. That fact truly annoyed me. It annoyed me right up to the realization that "me and several thousand others" should have all seen this coming and that I am nothing special as it concerns prestidigitation.

But how could we have all missed it? How could so many people across the country missed it? Obama's choice for the Nobel was so obvious as to be nothing less than a sure thing as i reflect on it now. I only wish I had gone to one of those on line betting services and bet the farm on it while I still had the chance.

But thus is the story of my life, always a day late and a dollar short, but it put me to thinking. And what I have been thinking about as the real reason behind the decision to choose Obama. And once again, I surprised myself.

The reason that the Nobel committee4e chose Barack Hussein Obama for this year's peace prize? Simple.....appeasement. Surely there is a certain element of the lingering sentiments of "anyone but Bush" in there decision, but this decision runs far deeper than the surface representations. This decision was based upon something far more bothersome IMO. And to his credit, Rush Limbaugh saw precisely what I saw earlier in the day and reported his conclusion on his program today.

After he was sufficiently past his obligatory blustering and dead pan joking about the size of Obama's head now matching his ears, Rush let the cat out of the bag. The Nobel committee as Rush so deftly asserted, had just lobbed a grenade right smack into the center of America's domestic and foreign policy debate. Actually, Rush said that they lobbed it into Obama's domestic and foreign policy debate, but I believe the reality runs deeper. they weren't targeting Obama, they were targeting America.

What Rush Limbaugh calls a grenade, I choose to call a logic bomb. A dilemma of potentially momentous destructive capability to this country. It wasn't the European socialists (led by the Nobel Committee) intention to simply target a president and present a dilemma to him. After all, he is already on their side. There isn't much that they could do to persuade him further of the virtues of their version of Vichy socialism, but there was and there is a lot that they can do to influence the political debate in the halls of congress and in American media.

And there ladies and gentlemen is the target that these Vichy socialist of the Nobel committee was truly aiming for. They already realize and recognize that they have a friend and a sympathizer in the White House. And they must have been all but bursting at the seams for the past several months wanting to make this announcement, but they couldn't. To act prematurely would spoil the entire plan.

They must have been literally trembling over the past three weeks, as the war in Afghanistan and the drama between the president, his general, the people and the media have played out. Would their man spoil the entire plan by acting hastily or by having his hand forced by the media or the people? Certainly not they must have hoped.

They knew that for their plan to work, everything must remain static until they could make the earth shaking announcement of their choice for the award. And so it has come to pass. President Obama has successfully avoided and dodged all serious inquiries by the media and repeated requests from senators and congressmen and members of the media to lay out his plan for Afghanistan and how he intends to proceed concerning the general's recommendation.

And then today comes the bomb shell. The announcement of the peace prize award to a novice president with absolutely no accomplishments or record of achievement. Rush Limbaugh saw this announcement as an ego boost to the president's already over inflated opinion of himself. Where as I see it as something entirely different. I believe that someone put a bug in Obama's ear months ago about his selection for the prize. Obama knew it was coming and all he had to do was to be the artful dodger until the announcement was made.

And once that announcement was made? He knew that it would immediately provide him with the "out" in Afghanistan that he has been waiting for. Obama knew from day one what his intents were concerning the war and all that he has been waiting for is the right tumblers to click into place on the global mechanism. That is why he has not been concerned about the mounting casualty rates or anything else concerning the war in Afghanistan.

He has known all along how he intends to play his hand and the awarding of the Peace prize today consummates his agreement with the Vichy socialists of Europe.

These are the same people that allowed Hitler to rise and flourish and they will once again allow an enemy and disease in their midst to rise and consume them. But first they wanted to be able to cripple the one agent capable of intervention with the ability to stop another tyranny. They wanted to have America on board this time and from the looks of it they do. WE will be co-conspirators and co-victims for what is coming this time around.

How can this "man of peace" go forth in prosecution of what most of Europe feels is an unjust war now? How can Obama not see the shared socialist reality, that the irritability of Muslims globally, has only been exacerbated by George. And that now is the time for socialism to appease the great Islamic mass of discontent.

The socialists wailed for eight years and tortured themselves over the cowboy Bush and his refusal to abandon Israel and his refusal to turn away from his capitalist war of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan but now all of that is behind them. They have their guy in the drivers seat and they are going to do all in their ability to prop him up and aid him in any way that they can toward the common goal.

A conspiracy if defined as two or more people acting in concert toward a shared aim or goal. If there really any difference when conspiracy is born between countries? Born of both direct and clandestine acts of international hooliganism masquerading as peace?

I think not. And there is your conspiracy ladies and gentlemen. And a grand one it is. They have been working on it for six decades now and by George! (pun intended) I think they have finally done it. Look for Barack Obama to dilly dally for another two to three weeks on Afghanistan before he unveils his plan. Reason? The plan is still being formulated to the desires of all involved (his handlers). Both on this side of the Atlantic and on theirs.

Then once he is ready (told) to reveal it, look for another of his prime time speeches to the people on all the major networks. Where he will lay out his plan and reasoning for withdrawing from Afghanistan and Iraq. Two for the price of one is my bet. He won't be satisfied until we have left both countries in their death throes and at the mercy of his new partners the Taliban. And his soon to be new best friends at the international bargaining table Al Qaida and HAMAS.

That's what I see coming and I see it all hinging on today's announcement. The newly elected messiah is a man of peace. How could he not fulfill his destiny.

Bogus

President Barack Obama wins Nobel Peace Prize

In a word? Bogus! That was the first word that popped into my head in the wee hours of the morning as I awoke to the news of the messianic one having been given the Nobel Peace prize. Of course all of the headlines blare of how he has "won it", but please riddle me this....what has he done to win it? What has anyone done to win it over the past thirty odd years.

The Nobel Peace prize is nothing that is won. It is simply given. And it is nothing more than the door prize awarded by the collective thinking of anti American Marxist and communist around the world. It has absolutely less than nothing to do with the origins of its original inception or concept. The prize is nothing more than a booby prize awarded by the anti west, anti capitalism, anti democracy cabal of Marxist communist dissidents and their dregs in academia.

Alfred Nobel may have been inspired to leave his estate as a penitence for his sins of invention, but surely the management of the Nobel trust long ago lost its bearing and purpose in the world. The prize is now given to those of least qualification and the most dubious of accomplishment IMO.

I recognized when Yasser Arafat was given the prize years ago, that the entire purpose and stature of the award was forever more tarnished and pointless. How could you give a peace prize to one of the world's most prominent terrorist leaders and then claim that it was awarded based upon his efforts to promote peace. The same is true with Obama's selection IMO.

Unless they intend to rename it the Nobel Appeasement prize? Then would someone please explain to me Obama's qualifications for being given it? According to old Alfred's qualifiers? The prize should be awarded based upon the following "to the person who shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses."

Well let's see shall we.....How is Obama's fraternity of nations project going? It looks to me like the only fraternity that he has established, is a furtherance of hate and dislike of America amongst the other countries of the world. All those countries except those that we should be pushing away from, are curiously looking at us as if we have gone mad. Meanwhile our enemies chuckle and the two other super powers are forming closer bonds and building toward the day when they will join forces against us.

As for the abolishing of standing armies? I believe that the American military is the only one presently in danger of being abolished. If we aren't first conquered or completely devastated by the coming war. But I thought this was a peace prize? Isn't this about working toward peace? And just how is that all going to play out in the near future, after Barack Obama has lost the war in Afghanistan, seen to it that several thousand more of America's youth are slaughtered and then retreated from Iraq.

Is that how it is done? Is that how you win the vaunted Nobel Peace prize in it's present incarnation? Simply trade your country's future and the liberty of a nation on the alter of fascist idealism, masquerading as chic socialism? But are these stated criteria really the honest criteria for selection? I think not.

I think as I have for over thirty years now....the Nobel Peace prize has nothing to do with peace and everything to do with anti Americanism and the pursuit of Marxist goals. And anyone who fails to see or recognize those realities is either an abject liar or moronically stupid.

Revel in the Glory messiah! For as the weeks and months pass by, the shine of your tin prize will be further dulled and revealed as the sham that it truly represents. (for those capable of seeing.)

Obama's fame is fastly fading, so his buddies in socialist Europe have decided to prop him up a bit with their supposedly prestigious Nobel award. All together now ladies and gentlemen, applause is in order. Our messiah has reached another mile stone.

President Barack Obama won the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for "his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples," the Norwegian Nobel Committee said, citing his outreach to the Muslim world and attempts to curb nuclear proliferation.


How fitting and ridiculous...........

Hale! Caesar approaches!

Ten More Brave Souls

Ten US soldiers killed in Afghanistan

Ten more brave Americans died yesterday in that worthless spit of land called Afghanistan. Fighting a war that our media tells us the American people no longer support. Yet that same media? They tell us that a majority of Americans want to utilize military strikes to address the Iranian nuclear threat.

Ten more dead Americans in Afghanistan and what did our president do after receiving that news? Apparently he carried on with his personal plans for the evening and went out on an anniversary date with his wife in Washington. I suppose it could have been worse, instead of going to a local restaurant in the DC area, he could have opted to jet her back down to New York for the date (like he did last time) or even all the way back to Chicago for the occasion. After all, it's not like he doesn't have a fleet of executive aircraft at his disposal and an army of support staff to cater to his every whim.

I mention the presidential date only as a point of demonstrating the context, in comparison to what is going on right now in this administration. Especially as it concerns this president's perceptions of his duties and responsibilities to the people of America and how he approached those duties and responsibilities. Is it even possible to criticize the appearances that this president is purposely giving to both Americans and the rest of the world by his lackidasical attitudes?.

IMO, many of his presidential decisions to this point, have been an ongoing series of catastrophic errors in judgment. And these errors are continuing to threaten the safety of this country and it's military personnel currently stationed in harm's way. He is demonstrating daily his abject inability to lead this nation or to recognize the relevance of his actions or their influence and effect on the nation's safety and our enemies.

His actions are not only having an adverse effect here in America, but also around the world and especially in the Muslim world. Our enemies recognize the weakness being demonstrated and they are acting as a result of it.

There were many Americans Friday who were absolutely shattered over the loss of the 2016 Olympic bid by the city of Chicago and they immediately sought to blame the loss on America's image globally. Of course they blamed the Bush administration for that image, never once considering that president Obama, as apologist in chief for the past nine months, has weakened this nation and invited the collective disdain of the world.

But more importantly IMO, his actions have led to an emboldenment of our enemies in Afghanistan and Iraq and that emboldenment is continuing to increase daily. AL Quaida and Bin Ladin are daily growing stronger and these coordinated attacks on our personnel in Afghanistan are evidence of the new found inspiration that this president has given our enemies.

It has not gone un-noticed in the past two weeks that our president has been revealed to have all but ignored the war and his recently appointed general in charge in Afghanistan. And obviously our enemies have taken note and chosen to increase their efforts and push harder in order to advance their efforts in Afghanistan. They will soon be doing the same in Iraq as we are now abandoning our hard won victory there.

Only a fool would fail to recognize the correlation between what is happening over the past three months in Afghanistan and Iraq and the policies and lack of leadership being demonstrated by this president.

Meanwhile, many of our nation's most precious and cherished resources are being placed in direct jeopardy and killed due to the abject stupidity and arrogance of this man.

My father use to say.....that we should never become angry with people because they were ignorant. Their ignorance simply demonstrated that they didn't know any better. But he said....... that when it came to stupidity, there was absolutely no excuse. Stupidity meant that you knew better, yet you chose to be stupid and act stupidly knowing the consequences.

Is there any doubt that this president isn't ignorant of his actions? Can he possibly be so stupid as to not recognize that his ignoring the war in Afghanistan while focusing his attention on his socialist health care reform bill and parochial issues like the Chicago Olympic bid, have inspired our enemies to take notice and take advantage of his demonstrated weakness. Can he possibly be so stupid as to not understand that weakness in the face of tyranny, murder and terror only leads to more of the same?

Personally? I don't believe the man to be either ignorant or stupid. Which leaves only the reality. And that reality is no more complicated to understand, than to recognize and acknowledge that this president is a committed Fabian socialist and one who is hell bent to destroy and dismantled as much of this country and what has made it the leader of the world as he possibly can.

Yes, ten more brave Americans died in Afghanistan yesterday and this president could give a shit less. all you have to do is watch and observe his actions and responses to know that.

The IOC didn't buy diversity

Obama making case for Chicago's diversity -- The critics? They'll get tickets.

A lot has been made of the news since yesterday, when it was announced that Chicago didn't make the final cut for the 2016 summer games. The lead up stories were almost congratulatory in advance in their coverage across the board concerning the coming announcement by the IOC. President Obama (it would seem) was only making the journey to Copenhagen to seal the deal and the critics would be left crying after the great Chicago triumph was announced by the IOC.

What a difference a day makes........

Since yesterday, I have read a number of articles and watched several videos of the news coverage surrounding the announcement and Chicago's loss. And in each report there seems to be a collective sense of theft. The liberal left that was already celebrating in the streets of Chicago, dressed in their Chicago 2016 Olympic regalia, were left with a muttering hush moments after the IOC eliminated Chicago first. Then the wailing began.

And it took less than a few hours before the likes of Senator Roland Burress (Obama's replacement in the senate), began giving interviews blaming the city's loss on George Bush no less.

But to me, one of the most humorous parts to the entire story revolves around Rahm Emanuel (Obama's go to guy), who all but let it be known that the deal was "a done deal" and that he would insure that the GOP critics would have good seats for the 2016 Chicago games.

Seems his biggest selling point and greatest belief concerning the win, rested with his perception that Chicago's "diversity" would win the day and sway the world to the Chicago way of thinking.

"There's no better city in the United States or the world to host the international community than Chicago -- because of the diversity,'' Emanuel said. "You're going to bring literally the whole world together for Olympic games, sports games, and competition. Chicago's a great competitive city -- has always been that. It has a great amount of diversity and it would be great for Chicago also for not only its diversity but for the economic opportunity that it provides in the sense of jobs and economic growth.

Different from Rio or Madrid?

"Nothing against them, but Chicago is what none of the other cities have and this is again what I think the president's remarks will be, not saying anything negative against them, but you're bringing all the world together... The world will feel comfortable given the diversity of Chicago all the different ethnic communities are there...''

That was then and this is now. And there is no joyous after glow in either Chicago or Washington this morning. Just more liberal angst and the mutterings of all the unfairness and the "theft" of something that some how or another, is perceived by liberals as being "rightfully theirs."

Blame it on Rio?

Celebration in the streets of Rio


Obama's Olympian gamble collapses

Blame it on Rio? Not so fast there bucko!

Most have heard the news today that Chicago didn't win the 2016 Olympic bid. That loud thundering thud that resounded from Copenhagen was just Obama's ego hitting the floor according to some.

I was waiting to see how long it would take for blame to be assigned somewhere other than the messiah? And I just found the first glimpse.

Roland Burris, the recently appointed US Senator from Illinois, appointed to replace Barack Obama already had his take on it. he blames George Bush for Chicago's loss.

Who woulda thunk it.

What was that clunk?

U.S. September Auto Sales Plunge; GM, Chrysler Hit Hard

What was that clunk that hit the headlines yesterday? Must have been the sound of the American auto industry clunking and crashing to the ground (again). So, they are right back to where they were before the federal bail out and the cash for clunkers program of the past few months attempted to save them.

It was my opinion (and that of many others) from the beginning (September of last year) that we should have allowed the auto makers to file for bankruptcy and de-ass the smothering union contracts that were crippling and killing the American auto industry. But Obama and his union supporting thugs were having nothing of that. Nor would our out going president Bush before him. Bush seemed content to just let the wreck of the American economy, coast silently into the next administration, while he prepared for the blessed obscurity that he longed for after the past eight years. (Thanks George).

Then once in office, Obama's rescue plan materialized. Spend billions on bailouts and the buying up of GM and auctioning off Chrysler to Fiat. Then create the cash for clunkers scheme and sell that to the people as a viable alternative to reality. Actually, cash for clunkers wasn't Obama's plan or his idea to begin with. The French and the Germans had already implemented a similar program in Europe, months before he ever debuted his plan here. And the European clunkers plan ended in the exact same result as ours has.

A lot of government money propping up a sinking auto industry and a forced perspective that changed absolutely nothing in the end. (What was that about doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different outcome?)

The only measurable result of any government sponsored forced perspective, is that in the end the people have less money and the problem remains unaltered and unchanged, only to become larger. These programs cannot be maintained or sustained simply by spending the people's money to create an alternative reality. (Money runs out eventually and so does credit.)

Alternative realities are wonderful works of science fiction, but the practical application of them by those engaged in relativist social gerrymandering has never worked and it never will. Nature always seeks it's own level of equilibrium just like water does. No matter how many times man attempts to alter the natural order, given the time and the opportunity, nature always returns things to as they were and seeks to provide its own non imposed solutions for the dilemma.

Thus is the current reality and the coming epitaph of Obama's grand scheme concerning the auto industry. The beauty part about capitalism, is that left to it's own devices, it will follow the same course as nature and water. It will find its own equilibrium. And having done so, just like the Darwinist scheme of natural selection, only the strong will survive. Which is as it should be.

Barack Obama hasn't saved the American auto industry, he has killed it. And he killed it by refusing to allow it to right itself and suffer through the throes of re-birthing itself into a new and viable industry, after having shed these strangling unions. He killed it because the disease that killed the American auto industry (union labor) told him to do it. He had to do it, after all.....the unions got him elected.

So now, the first month's numbers after the end of the cash for clunkers scam is in. And what do the statistics reveal?

"Sales for General Motors Co and Chrysler -- the two U.S. automakers struggling to regain momentum after emerging from bankruptcy -- dropped by 45 percent and 42 percent, respectively."

Which is precisely what the statistics will reveal in the months to come, as 2009 closes out as one of the worst economic years on record.

The American economic egg (Humpty Dumpty) is broken. And all the king's horses and all the king's men, can't put Humpty Dumpty back together again.

Eggs (golden or otherwise) once broken must be discarded. Our time and our effort (as a nation) needs to be invested in nurturing the goose that lays our golden eggs, not in strangling the old bird and cursing her over the eggs that we have broken. But our Fabian socialist "chef in chief" remains hell bent on making his socialist souffle and selling it to us as a banquet.

Marie Antoinette once served the people cake..... Meanwhile, our illustrious leader is hell bent on selling us fluffed up broken and rotten eggs.

As long as it wasn't "rape-rape"

I found this at my friend Ricks site, the Brutally Honest blog.

But I went and found a better clip of it on YouTube