Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Obama's Lies and His Liars Don't Matter To the Media

Obama's fantasy world of steadfastly anti American socialism takes America daily toward an abyss of failure that is incomprehensible to any reasoned thinking or patriotic American.  While the American media amuses themselves with racist team owners and creates the news of private conversations involving racism that become the lead stories of American media, the privately captured conversations of Barack Obama and his cabinet leaders continue to be purposely overlooked.

It was Barack Obama who told the Russians to wait until after he was re-elected....when he would have more "flexibility."   Obviously the American media didn't give a damn about that.  Or last week when John Kerry was overheard privately telling the Trilateral Commission that the Israelis were nothing more than racist bigots who needed to listen to his plan for a two state solution, or they are no better than those formerly engaged in Apartheid.  All that was left for Kerry in that conversation was the staple liberal tactic of branding the Israelis Nazis.

The bottom line, the private conversations that have been revealed during this administration concerning this president and his cabinet leaders, are far more harmful to America and Americans, than anything some octogenarian billionaire team owner ever said to his concubine.  But Americans are trained lap dogs.  They listen to, respond and project their anger only at those things they are told to by the media.

Thank you TMZ!  You are doing a helluva  a job of shoveling shit for the ever increasing mushroom population of America. Maybe one day when reality TV is revealed to be provided at the end of a gun barrel, the people will listen to truth then. 

Meanwhile, have a look at his Asian pivot lie.


Obama’s pivot to Asia will lack firepower

President Obama’s pivot to Asia will lack a crucial military underpinning next year, when for four months, the Navy will not have an aircraft carrier in the region. Defense cuts have helped shrink the number of available carriers, alarming GOP lawmakers who are fighting the Pentagon’s plan to permanently cut the number of U.S. carriers to 10. They argue not having a carrier in the region for months at a time will send a signal of U.S. weakness, as China seeks to make territorial claims against several U.S. allies over the South China Sea. “Symbolically, the worst thing we could do around the globe is to take one of those carriers out,” Rep. Randy Forbes (R-Va.) told defense reporters on Tuesday. “We really need two or three carriers there.” According to Forbes and House Armed Services Committee Chairman Buck McKeon (R-Calif.), there will not be a carrier in the region for about 130 days next year, between when the USS George Washington leaves its base in Japan, and when its replacement, the USS Ronald Reagan, arrives there.

Tuesday, April 29, 2014

Feds want to scour Net, media for 'hate speech'

If you don't believe that the present administration is actively pursuing the complete obliteration of the Bill of rights? You had better start paying attention. Hate speech as defined by Obama and his supporters, is any speech in opposition to the liberal socialist meme.


big-chill-feds-want-to-scour-net-media-for-hate-speech 

If two Democratic lawmakers have their way, Barack Obama’s Justice Department will submit a report for action against any Internet sites, broadcast, cable television or radio shows determined to be advocating or encouraging “violent acts.”
This according to the text of a new bill from Sen. Ed Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y.
The Hate Crime Reporting Act of 2014 “would create an updated comprehensive report examining the role of the Internet and other telecommunications in encouraging hate crimes based on gender, race, religion, ethnicity, or sexual orientation and create recommendations to address such crimes,” stated a news release from Markey’s office.
The one-page bill, reviewed by WND, calls for the Justice Department and the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights to “analyze information on the use of telecommunications, including the Internet, broadcast television and radio, cable television, public access television, commercial mobile services, and other electronic media, to advocate and encourage violent acts and the commission of crimes of hate.”
The bill does not define which actions by broadcasters would be considered to have encouraged violence, seemingly leaving that open to interpretation.

Monday, April 28, 2014

Some People Really Make You Stop And Think







DHS Stockpiling Civilian Application Muntions with Plans To Destroy Military Munitions?

So....in the midst of the Department of Homeland Security, buying millions of rounds of handgun and shotgun ammunition? For close to a billion dollars? Why is our government prepared to destroy over a million dollars in military grade ammunition? 

I know what my belief and suspicions are......what about yours? 



Report: Pentagon to destroy $1B in ammunition

WASHINGTON — The Pentagon plans to destroy more than $1 billion worth of ammunition although some of those bullets and missiles could still be used by troops, according to the Pentagon and congressional sources.
It's impossible to know what portion of the arsenal slated for destruction — valued at $1.2 billion by the Pentagon — remains viable because the Defense Department's inventory systems can't share data effectively, according to a Government Accountability Office report obtained by USA TODAY.
The result: potential waste of unknown value.
"There is a huge opportunity to save millions, if not billions of dollars if the (Pentagon) can make some common-sense improvements to how it manages ammunition," said Sen. Tom Carper, D-Del., and chairman of the Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee. "Despite years of effort, the Army, Navy and Air Force still don't have an efficient process for doing something as basic as sharing excess bullets. This Government Accountability Office (GAO) report clearly shows that our military's antiquated systems lead to millions of dollars in wasteful ammunition purchases."

 

 

Watching China, The New Threat & America's Proposed "Muscular Response"

For months and years I have been telling people to watch China.  Pay attention to what the Chinese are doing. Look at their preparations militarily, then ask yourself what they are planning and looking forward to in the future.

With the recent escalations in the Crimea involving the Russians and the Ukraine,  Americans had better sit up and pay attention to Chinese ambitions concerning Taiwan ad even Japan.  The Chinese have been building a substantial amphibious assault capability with the construction of amphibious assault ships, aircraft and ship to ship missile technology over the last fifteen years.

Thank former president Bill Clinton for giving the Chinese the telemetry technology they need to put their ICBM's on par with American missile technology. Now the best weapons technology estimates have made it public, that  China has now developed "carrier killing missile technology"  that America cannot defeat, along with an array of proposed space based satellite weapons that can be used against any target on the planet.

So tell me again?  About America's plan to put forth a muscular response to China? By sending our carriers into their hood and by flying a few of our no longer stealthy B-2 bombers in proximity to their borders?  Something tells me the Chinese are neither impressed or threatened by the weak minded reactions of this president or his now all but neutered and ball-less Pentagon command staff.

Yes, by all means, do watch and pay attention to the Chinese and their actions, because at the appropriate time, they will educate this president in the finer arts of international diplomacy through strength and projected power. They are already doing it. 

U.S. Beefs Up Military Options for China as Obama Reassures Allies in Asia


April 27, 2014 7:52 p.m. ET The U.S. military has prepared options for a muscular response to any future Chinese provocations in the South and East China seas, ranging from displays of B-2 bomber flights near China to aircraft-carrier exercises near its coastal waters, officials said. Julian Barnes reports. Photo: Getty. WASHINGTON—The U.S. military has prepared options for a muscular response to any future Chinese provocations in the South and East China seas, ranging from displays of B-2 bomber flights near China to aircraft-carrier exercises near its coastal waters, officials said. The menu of options, described by officials briefed on the action plan, reflects concerns that U.S. allies in Asia have about the Obama administration's commitments to its security obligations, particularly after Russia's seizure of the Crimean peninsula.

The "You Don't Say" Campaign of Not So Free Speech

Free speech is trumped by hate speech.  its in the constitution right?  The founding fathers were very explicit about their thoughts concerning speech. They were adamant that all speech was fair speech and protected speech, just as long as it didn't offend anyone. right?

Welcome to the egalitarian secular world of humanism and the re-defined parameters of acceptable speech in America.  We no longer live in a society where individual thought and speech is a closely guarded and constitutionally protected right.

Those concepts are obviously outdated and hinged upon some alien premise that individualism and individual rights somehow are a least less valued than the forced perspectives of societal shapers who are allowed to say and do as they please. Those who claim contempt while they attempt to police the actions and thoughts of everyone else?  Are in fact as contemptible as those they seek to damn via their own skewed bigotry in my humble opinion, but the purveyors of mass media don't see it that way. The egalitarian meme must be preserved and promoted at all costs.

There may have been a time when most Americans believed that their constitutional rights were inviolable by their government or their media, but those days are changing if not completely a thing of the past.  If you as an American, are not a member of one of the protected classes or a member of a favored minority, then the simple truth that is being revealed daily in our media, is that you don't have any rights under the law.  Your rights have been trumped by the false gods of egalitarianism and secular humanistic socialism and you had better get used to it.

Welcome to your "Brave New World" as Aldous Huxley would say and as it concerns our brave new world of politically acceptable language and acceptable words and phrases?


"Political language... is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind."

George Orwell


‘Man Up,’ ‘Don’t Be A Pussy’ Labeled Offensive Language at Duke University

A new word-discouragement campaign at Duke University has labeled phrases such as “Man Up,” “That’s So Gay,” and “Don’t Be a Pussy” offensive language that “delegitimizes” homosexuality and oppresses and insults people.
But as the campaign has gained national popularity, its detractors have bristled at the effort, calling it a politically correct war on words that will stifle free speech and suggesting its true aim is to redefine terms to control public opinion and – ultimately – public policy.
In fact, the “You Don’t Say” campaign creators have admitted as much.
“Language is a reflection of how we think about others and view the world,” Jay Sullivan, a student leader of the campaign, tells Duke Today. “My goal is to…. help facilitate discussion about how language affects many social issues, from race to gender and sexuality.”
The campaign consists of a series of black-and-white memes with students posing behind large pledges to avoid so-called offensive language.

Friday, April 25, 2014

Damn Her Lying Eyes

Hillary Clinton didn't mind telling a congressional committee that the fact that four Americans were killed in Benghazi because of her ad Obama's incompetence didn't make any difference, but now she wants everyone to know that the attack and death of these "uh two state department personnel and two CIA contractors" is the biggest regret of her tenure as Secretary if state. 


Clinton calls Benghazi terror attack 'biggest regret' on her watch

In a question and answer session at Simmons College Wednesday night, Clinton listed the terrorist assault on the diplomatic compound in eastern Libya as her “biggest regret.”

"It would certainly be the attack on our facility in Benghazi, and the loss of, uh, two State Department personnel and two CIA contractors from the terrorist attack and the terrible consequences of that," she said. "It's very, very painful and it was certainly the biggest regret that I had as Secretary of State."

Thursday, April 24, 2014

Confusing God and Government? I Don't Think So........


Jeremiah Wright stood in the pulpit of Trinity church in Chicago in 2003 and claimed that Americans were confusing God with government. The favored reverend of Barack Obama went on too damn America and to attempt to claim that his belief and actions were in the bible. The chickens are coming home to roost America! Lamented this supposed man of God.

Most Americans remember the Jeremiah Wright sermon that was revealed to the entire country during the 2008 presidential campaign. Most Americans remember it, but few did anything about it. Few took note with enough interest to care whether Barack Obama was elected president or not.

Too many Americans were too burdened with their egalitarian spawned race guilt over being white and oppressors. They were too burdened to ever look at Barack Obama objectively, or his record or associations with Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers. Americans were too burdened..... to even attempt to deny at the ballot box, the first black presidency, regardless of who that person was and regardless of what they represented.

Last week Harry Reid called American patriots standing up for their rights in Nevada, domestic terrorists.  People who stood up against the BLM attempting to run ranchers off of the land that the BLM is complicit in trying to give to Harry Reid's business partners.  Where was Harry Reid when Bill Ayers and the Weather Underground were bombing American government facilities in the 1960's?  Where was Harry Reid when Jeremiah Wright was issuing a call to arms in his church against white people and damning America with the complicit aid and approval of American media?

For those who believe that Obama Care is the greatest thing that has ever happened in America and that Obama Care is all sunshine, rainbows and lollipops, have a look at the most recent reality of the tragedy of the Obama presidency. As the Reverend Wright once said? The chickens are coming home to roost America! Jeremiah Wright has famously damned America and c;aimed his right to do so was in the bible. But if anyone is damning America in today's world? It is Barack Obama and those who support his Fabian socialism, anti capitalism and the destruction and degradation of America and her traditions.


Obamacare Slashes Senior Home Health Care Services


"Over 3.5 million seniors receive health care services in their home. Over 60% of the recipients are women. These beneficiaries tend to be older, poorer and sicker than the overall Medicare population. Because of this, they often lack transportation, making home health care services critical for their well-being. Those impacted by the ongoing cuts are the most vulnerable and at-risk seniors.

Obamacare gave the Obama administration wide latitude in containing spending in the program. In a decision that baffled critics, however, the administration chose to impose the maximum cuts allowed, cutting reimbursements by 14% over the next four years. The announced cuts will dramatically shrink the home health care sector and leave over a million seniors without access to health services."

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Expanding Personal Protection Laws in Georgia

Today is the day that Georgians will see their individual rights as gun owners expanded. As a gun owner and as a retired law enforcement officer, all I can say is....."its about time." It is not law abiding citizens who carry firearms that we as Georgians need to fear. It is those in Washington who seek to take away our rights leaving us at the mercy of criminals and anarchist who we need to fear. In thirty years of law enforcement in a major urban city like Atlanta, (a southern city where those in other parts of the country look down on southerners as ignorant gun toting hicks), I never encountered a situation involving a firearm used during the commission of a crime, where the person on the other end of the weapon had a licensed carry permit. 

 I never had the occasion or necessity to arrest anyone using a firearm legally to defend themselves or their property, however, I arrested hundreds if not thousands who were thugs and criminals carrying and using firearms. Criminals don't obey licensing laws, anymore than they obey any other laws. I remember when Georgia passed concealed carry in the late 1970's. The wailing and gnashing of teeth was palpable from those on the left and from the anti gun liberals. 

Those like then state representative, now congressman David Scott lamented: "If we allow this law to take effect? There will be gun battles in the streets and police officers will be killed in record numbers." The bottom line, it never happened. The only thing that did happen, is that many places in Georgia became safer because people were carrying concealed weapons and the criminals knew it. I salute Governor Deal for having the foresight and the fortitude to ignore those who would deny Georgians their constitutional right to keep and bear arms. 


Georgia governor to sign 'unprecedented' bill expanding gun rights

Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal is expected to sign legislation Wednesday expanding gun rights in the state. The bill, described by the National Rifle Association’s lobbying arm as "the most comprehensive pro-gun reform legislation introduced in recent state history," expands the scope of public places where licensed owners are allowed to carry firearms. The bill makes several changes to state law. It allows those with a license to carry to bring a gun into a bar without restriction and into some government buildings that don't have certain security measures. It also allows religious leaders to decide whether it's OK for a person with a carry license to bring a gun into their place of worship.

Tuesday, April 22, 2014

The Cold War Was Easier According to Kerry

 It would be funny if the realities weren't so serious and the stakes so high.  Aside from having Barack Obama as president, the only thing that I can think of more dangerous to America, is having John Kerry as Secretary of State.  Aside from the fact that the man is a traitor to this nation and has been repeatedly exposed as such, he is literally an imbecile when it comes to the most basic levels of communication beyond his Dystopian hatred of America and his love of socialist communism.

Make no mistake, John Kerry has been a communist and a communist sympathizer for over forty years. He made his bones with the communist of Asia in Paris in the early 1970's, while he was undercutting our troops in Vietnam behind the scenes at the Paris Peace Talks. Kerry seriously believes that he has a relationship and a rapport with those in the port vietnam communist world who he believes share his beliefs.  




Hillary Clinton was certainly a socialist liberal and remains so,  however, John Kerry is dangerous. He is dangerous because he seriously lacks any reasoned understanding of world dynamics, geopolitical interactions between nations state friends and nation state enemies or the present actions of Americas two greatest adversaries in particular,  Russia and China.

I seriously wonder how long it is going to take before Vladimir Putin takes decisive and dramatic action in  the Ukraine and eastern Europe. and how long after that before he sends the message to America...."can you hear me now? 


Kerry says the cold war was easier. He would know

Washington (AFP) - Secretary of State John Kerry attested Tuesday to the massively complex challenges Washington faces in Ukraine, Russia, Iran and the Middle East, declaring "it was easier" during the Cold War.
In a candid moment during a State Department speech, the top US diplomat said changing global power dynamics made a quaint memory of the early East-West stalemate, when American children would "crouch under our desks at school and practice" safety steps for a possible nuclear attack.
"During the Cold War... it was easier than it is today -- simpler is maybe a way to put it," Kerry told aid and development experts.
"The choices were less varied, less complicated, more stark, more clear: Communism, democracy, West, East, the Iron Curtain."
He said "multiple emerging powers," unleashed forces like radical Islam, and "too many failed states" have dramatically complicated the landscape, requiring a form of diplomatic precision that was not absolutely necessary decades ago.

Sunday, April 20, 2014

Michelle Obama on Race and entitlement in America

I'm sorry. I watched the video and "Why do you hate white people" is not what I heard or came away with after listening carefully to Michelle Obama's remarks.  What I did come away with is an obvious entrenched belief that regardless of how many entitlements and opportunities the Obama's were given? 

Nothing is good enough or ever will be good enough to offset their entrenched and shared racial views of America. Both Barack In my opinion, both Obama and Michelle Obama are examples of blacks who were singled out for special treatment and special opportunities in life. They were not singlec out for discrimination mind you, but they were singled out for accelerated privilege.

If there was any discrimination involved in the story lines of their lives, it involved those who were discriminated against for the benefit of Barack and Michelle Obama and others who were given the benefit of not having to compete on the same level as everyone else because of their race. Yet even in light of this reality. Michelle Obama remained a bitter woman who sees racism hiding behind every corner in 2008. Much as she continues to see her beliefs in racism today and this is six years into her husband's presidency. 

No....this woman has never been proud of America, not even after her husband was elected president. She was not proud then and she is not proud now. She is not proud because she has never been proud of America her entire life and watching and listening to her comments on race in America serves to explain why. She believes that she has been slighted because of her race and she sees the root causes of her seemingly justifiable hatreds and dislikes of her country and her perceived bigotry of white people as firmly and justifiably being based in their racism.  What she fails to understand, is that the racism that continues to skew her perspectives and belief systems is her own.

Saturday, April 19, 2014

The BLM is Kinda Like the Bureau of Indian Affairs.

The Bureau of Land Management, is kinda like the Bureau of Indian Affairs. They both pretty much make it up as they go along and congress periodically revisits their leases and control over the American people, to manipulate and control the best interests of those who stand to make the most money from the regulation and activities  of these agencies

 Some interesting conflicts are emerging concerning the BLM. As it concerns the Bureau of Land Management and its directives, there seem to be conflicts in both purpose and management. The following is excerpted from the Wikipedia link outlining the history of the BLM and demonstrating the irony of what this agency is supposed to be doing, versus what it is actually doing.

 "In 1946, the Grazing Service was merged with the General Land Office (a product of the country's territorial expansion and the federal government's nineteenth-century homesteading policies) to form the Bureau of Land Management within the Department of the Interior. When the BLM was initially created, there were over 2,000 unrelated and often conflicting laws for managing the public lands. The BLM had no unified legislative mandate until Congress enacted the Federal Land Policy and Management Act of 1976 (FLPMA). In FLPMA, Congress recognized the value of the remaining public lands by declaring that these lands would remain in public ownership. Congress used the term "multiple use" management, defined as "management of the public lands and their various resource values so that they are utilized in the combination that will best meet the present and future needs of the American people."
 But there is also this interesting new wrinkle.

"In one of his last official acts of office, Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne has helped pave the way for his replacement, Ken Salazar, by authorizing the BLM to establish offices that will expedite renewable energy development on the National System of Public Lands. The new Renewable Energy Coordination Offices will expedite the permitting of wind, solar, biomass, and geothermal projects on BLM-managed lands, along with the electrical transmission facilities needed to deliver the energy from those projects to power-thirsty cities.[9] The offices will initially be located in the four states where companies have shown the greatest interest in renewable energy development: Arizona, California, Nevada, and Wyoming. The new offices will also improve the BLM's coordination with state agencies and other federal agencies, including DOE and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency."

Wednesday, April 16, 2014

WWIII ? More Likely, The End of America As a Nation of Any Influence Globally.

I said a couple of weeks ago, that Putin called Obama to tell him what he intended to do in the Ukraine and to let Obama know that there isn't anything that he or America can do about it. Personally, I know that the United States still has the military ability to both deter and defeat Russia, the problem is, we no longer have the collective willpower or leadership. And Vadimir Putin and the rest of the world now knows it.

Will the Russians invade? Maybe that's a definition that will become parsed in the very near future, but the bottom line is that Russia will soon be the only authority in the Ukraine and they will more than likely accomplish that without firing a shot.

One thing we can count on, the no balls Untied Nations and the NATO pack countries will not do anything absent America's leadership and seeing as how we are presently leaderless, the Ukraine is a done deal for the Russians. Stay tuned and watch what unfolds.

 

EDWARD LUCAS: I hope I'm wrong but historians may look back and say this was the start of World War III


  • 'Vladimir Putin is striking at the heart of the West'
  • 'We can chose to surrender any responsibility we have to protect Ukraine and the Baltic states'
  • 'Or we can mount a last-ditch attempt to deter Russia from furthering its imperial ambitions'
  • 'If we choose to resist Putin, we will risk a terrifying miltary escalation'
  • 'I do not think it an exaggeration to say this could bring us to the brink of nuclear war'
Deep in the flat and featureless landscape of eastern Ukraine, it is all too ­possible that the outline of World War III is taking shape.

Whipped up by the Kremlin ­propaganda machine and led by Russian ­military intelligence, armed men are erecting road blocks, storming police stations and ripping down the country’s flag.

They are demolishing not just their own country — bankrupt, ill-run and beleaguered — but also the post-war order that has kept most of Europe and us, here in Britain, safe and free for decades.
Vladimir Putin is striking at the heart of the West.



Tuesday, April 15, 2014

We The People Are Under Attack


I was not alone in my prediction that the standoff with Clive Bundy and his family and the federal government over the Bundy ranch and cattle and the actions of the federal government to seize them were not over. Yesterday his imminence Harry Reid made it plain when asked concerning the federal retreat from the standoff in Nevada:

“Well, it’s not over,” Reid, D-Nev., told KRNV-TV in Reno on Monday. “We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over.” Apparently Messer Reid is unfamiliar with the crimes of congress, the Obama administration and the justice department that have been "Walked away from" in the past five years, just to name a few.

Today we have reports from someone with contacts inside the federal government is verifying what most intelligent people already realize. The Bureau of Land Management and the other federal agencies involved in this dispute are each and every one dead set on establishing their rights to imminent domain over the private property rights of common citizens and they are dead set on enforcing their imminent federal authority over private citizens and states sovereignty.

All current and former US military personnel and all current and former law enforcement personnel in America have taken oaths that closely mirror these preamble words below:

"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same."

Added wording has been applied to the various state oaths of office, as has wording that is specific to state Nation Guard units, but the core principle of that preamble remains the same. Each and every former and current member of our military branches and our law enforcement branches, have each sworn allegiance to the Constitution of the United states of America and as such, to the people of America.

Therefore, when the modern day brown shirts in the camouflaged BDU's of the various federal agencies, carrying out the unlawful and unconstitutional orders of the present regime of tyranny in America Arrive. So, when their abuse of power and the constitutional rights of others arrives on your television news and across the media screens of the mainstream media, don't be shocked or surprised. When you see federal and local authorities engaged in acts of unlawful and unconstitutional violence and trespass against law abiding citizens in Nevada? Remember who these people are and what they are representing, but most importantly, remember that they are in direct violation of the oaths that they swore to uphold and protect and they are therefore, criminals to the oaths they swore to uphold.

 

Sheriff: Feds strategize for 'raid' on ranch 

The executive director of the Constitutional Sheriffs and Peace Officers Association says his sources inside the federal government warn that Washington’s weekend retreat in a dispute over grazing land in Nevada was only a move to distract attention and diffuse tensions, because a raid on the family’s ranch still is planned. And there probably would be violence involved, said Richard Mack, the former sheriff of Graham County, Ariz. “I don’t think it would be possible” to launch a raid without violence, he told WND Monday. “I don’t think the Bundys would lie down and be taken.” He cited the vow by Sen. Harry Reid, D-Nev., that the confrontation was far from over, despite the weekend’s retreat by armed gunmen working for federal agencies. Reid on Monday told KRNV-TV in Reno: “It’s not over. We can’t have an American people that violate the law and then just walk away from it. So it’s not over.”

Sunday, April 13, 2014

Have You Enlisted In The Obama Team's Favored Army?

Looks like Jay Carney has. but then again, we all knew that already didn't we.Several media sources have posted the story, none of which are  mainstream media sources No networks or cable news or newspaper source that I have seen.

Obviously, it is what it is and it is just another example of no news, nothing to see here or be made aware of folks.  Have another slice of Apple pie and Bullsite and be happy we at the government allow you to continue to live your miserable little lives. 

Have You Enlisted? See Jay Carney's Soviet Propaganda Posters Inside His Home

 This one features a soldier asking “Have you enlisted?”

 This one features a Russian female factory worker and reads, “Women! Learn production, replace workers who went to the front! The stronger the hinterland - the stronger the front!"

And here they both are seen hanging in Carney's home, compliments of an article posted with photos of the Carney home in the latest issue of Washingtonian magazine

 

Is There Really Lack of Diversity in Late Night Television?

Is lack of diversity really the issue in late night television? Is late night comedy programming truly an example of the purposeful lack of diversity that is allegedly driven by racist and sexist network executives? Or is this issue just the most recent example of egalitarian secular humanism raising its ugly head in the continued attempt to control all aspects of our lives in America through media. I tend to believe the latter.

David Letterman lost his comedic luster decades ago in my opinion. His reign on late night at CBS was always overshadowed and relegated to second rate status by Jay Leno. Why? Because Letterman as many others, failed to understand the comedic success of the comic genius of Johnny Carson. Leno understood it. Carson was the template to follow and Leno did. Carson was the elder statesman of late night television for thirty years and Leno's reign lasted over twenty five on the Tonight Show.

Carson was king because he understood the people and he realized that partisan politics had no place in comedy, as did his successor Jay Leno. You are funny because you are an equal opportunity humorist or jibist, or you are just another second rate partisan hack with a leftist political agenda like Letterman. Will Rogers understood this premise back in the days of radio, as did Bob Hope and a long list of successful legends in radio, television and entertainment who followed them.

If the elevation of Steven Colbert to the seat soon to be vacated by David Letterman represents anything, it represents the continued attempts by leftist controlled media in America to control the thoughts of Americans via the continued hustle of leftist basal humor. That gut aching rib splitting humor of the greats remains absent from the routines of the left's star personalities of today, because they have never understood what true marketable humor really is and they still don't.

I could go on concerning the all stars of today's leftist comedy, but most people are familiar with these personalities and they already know why they don't like them. If Jimmy Fallon intends to wear the crown of the recently departed king of late night? He too had better understand that there is both method to madness and method to late night humor. The method is simple. "Be funny at the expense of all."

Colbert's "Shtick" presently is derived exclusively from his faux conservatism. His false persona as a slicked down, button down conservative pitch man. Colbert is just the most recent example of the left's continued hacks at conservative and Christian values in America via the leftist preferred versions of comedy. If there is an overt and underlying consensus of dark thinking in the board rooms of major media in America, it does not involved racism or sexism. What it does involve is leftism. At all costs, the forced perspectives of socialist egalitarianism will be packaged and sold to the people via American media, regardless of their retching refusal to swallow the pablum that egalitarian controlled media hustles daily.

A better choice to challenge Fallon would have been Jon Stewart. Stewart actually tries to balance his comedic "Shtick" with regular jibes and jokes aimed at the left. If there is any comedian in today's world capable of easily wearing the mantle of across the board marketable humor, Jon Stewart is best capable of being the Johnny Carson or the Bob Hope of this generation. With that said, even his Daily show tends to be counter weighted toward the left on most days, but at the least they do recognize the absurdities of the left on a regular basis and rightly poke fun at those also.

No ladies and gentlemen, there is no lack of diversity in race or gender in late night television, but there is a significant lack of diversity as it concerns balanced humor and sadly that appears to be the future of late night comedy as far as can be seen into the immediate future.


Amid praise for Stephen Colbert, some ask: What about diversity in late night?

Before the announcement that comedian Stephen Colbert would take over the ‘Late Show’ post, television critics had come up with a number of candidates who are female or black or both.

 “Looking at the hilarious women across the rest of the TV dial – in sitcoms, Comedy Central shows, and Saturday Night Live – the idea that there are no women funny and likable enough to helm a TV show past 11:30 p.m. is increasingly absurd,” Esther Breger wrote in The New Republic before Thursday’s announcement.

Saturday, April 12, 2014

BLM Backs Down Is The Headline.

According to a news conference held by the Sheriff of Clarke county Nevada this morning, the Bundy feud and standoff with the BLM has come to an end with the Agents of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) ceding that they will disengage from further persecution of Rancher Clive Bundy and his family.

According to the InfoWars site, this complete sea change by the BLM has come about in less than 24 hours from the news being released by InfoWars, that Nevada Senator Harry Reid and a Chinese company were seeking to use the BLM to force Bundy and others off federal managed land, in order to pursue a green energy wind farm scheme that Reid apparently stood to make a lot of money on.

Personally, I don't believe the conflict between the Bundy family and the federal government is over. The BLM may have gone slinking away in retreat, but the forces of an evil socialist empire such as the Obama administration has been pushing on the American people for the last five years, will not simply go away and say never mind once they decide to act against citizens of this nation. The BLM will be back and the approach will be from an entirely different angle next time. Next time the approach they devise will allow them to first arrest and imprison the entire Bundy family and their supporters before the BLM and the Federal government move to take the land.

In addition, watching this sheriff at his press conference this morning,  tells me that this sheriff is weak as milk toast and nothing more than a tool for those in the federal government who have told him what his response and actions should be. In my opinion, one of the first things that should happen in the aftermath of this debacle, is that the citizens of Clarke county Nevada, should hold a recall election immediately to find a new sheriff. The citizens of Clarke county need to hire someone who is sworn to the people and constitutional rights of the people of Clarke county and someone who is devoted to upholding the laws of Nevada and protection the citizens of his county under our constitution, as opposed to being a willing accomplice to the attempted criminal acts of Harry Reid, supported by a militarized arm of the federal government.

Feds Back Down From Bundy Siege After Infowars Exposé of Chinese Land Grab

The Pending War in Nevada Is Not Over.

The news this morning, is that the Sheriff of the Nevada County, where the Bureau of Land Management had laid siege to a local resident, has no held a press conference and stated that the BLM is withdrawing from the area and once again making the land free public access.

This is not over folks. They are simply re0grouping to press the issues either on a new front, or from a different directions against this rancher and his family. Obama obviously doesn't want to continue to generate the bad press and deteriorating public sentiment against the federal government that has occurred this past week.

Yes.....this is a states rights and individual rights issue and obviously there are a lot of people willing to come to the area and stand toe to toe with the mounting tyranny of this administration.Americans need to stop watching mindless television programming and start paying attention to their country and the assault on their own personal freedoms. 

I believe that the 21st Century Tea Party moment is about to occur and it may just begin in Nevada.



Tuesday, April 08, 2014

Crossing Our Borders Illegally Is Not An Act of Love

I think Jeb Bush has sealed his fate and any future aspirations of running for any national public office.  While I realize that he is married to a Latin wife and he himself speaks Spanish, his position on the issue of immigration is nothing more than a gratuitous attempt to placate Latin interests at the expense of American interests.  Obviously, Jeb has never considered the adage that two wrongs do not make a right.

As someone who has two Latins by marriage in my family who have gone through the process to become Americans, I believe that I can speak from a knowledgeable and unbiased perspective concerning immigration and illegal immigration.  I am reminded of the words of Theodore Roosevelt when he said: "no man is above the law and no man is below it and we ask no man's permission when we require him to obey it."  We certainly need more of that direction in today's word, as we do an adherence to his other famous quote.

We should insist that if the immigrant who comes here does in good faith become an

American and assimilates himself to us he shall be treated on an exact equality with every one else, for it is an outrage to discriminate against any such man because of creed or birth-place or origin.

But this is predicated upon the man's becoming in very fact an American and nothing but an American. If he tries to keep segregated with men of his own origin and separated from the rest of America, then he isn't doing his part as an American. There can be no divided allegiance here. . . We have room for but one language here, and that is the English language, for we intend to see that the crucible turns our people out as Americans, of American nationality, and not as dwellers in a polyglot boarding-house; and we have room for but one soul loyalty, and that is loyalty to the American people.

Jeb Bush: Many illegal immigrants come out of an ‘act of love’

"A great country ought to know where those folks are and politely ask them to leave," he said, adding later that properly targeting people who overstay visas "would restore people's confidence" in the nation's immigration system.
"There are means by which we can control our border better than we have. And there should be penalties for breaking the law," he added. "But the way I look at this -- and I'm going to say this, and it'll be on tape and so be it. The way I look at this is someone who comes to our country because they couldn’t come legally, they come to our country because their families -- the dad who loved their children -- was worried that their children didn’t have food on the table. And they wanted to make sure their family was intact, and they crossed the border because they had no other means to work to be able to provide for their family. Yes, they broke the law, but it’s not a felony. It’s an act of love. It’s an act of commitment to your family. I honestly think that that is a different kind of crime that there should be a price paid, but it shouldn’t rile people up that people are actually coming to this country to provide for their families."

Tuesday, April 01, 2014

April Fools

Barack Obama and Joe Biden pulled off the biggest April Fools joke in history today, when they touted the affordable Care Act as a success for having reached the expressed goal of 7 million sign ups by midnight last night.

So.....they once again parse the reality and portray an illusionary reality as if it is the gospel truth. 
The truth continues to be revealed.  more Americans have lost their health care coverage time two or three than these two twits have claimed to have been signed up.


'The debate over repealing this law is over': Obama boasts 7.1 MILLION have signed up to Obamacare - but study shows just 858,000 newly insured Americans have paid up!

President took a major victory lap and took political shots at Republicans, but ignored shortcomings in his administration's official numbers

  • Press secretary Jay Carney will only say 'we're aggregating a lot of data' when asked how many enrollees have paid for coverage
  • Carney dodged questions about damning study that showed very few Obamacare customers were uninsured before the law took effect
  • Percentages from a hush-hush RAND Corporation study suggest barely 858,000 previously uninsured Americans have enrolled and paid premiums
  • HHS Secretary Sebelius met a televised challenge Monday about 'unpopular' Obamacare with lengthy awkward silence