The American Media Then & Now

For those interested and for those concerned over the recent actions of American mainstream media. Specifically, the manufacturing of fake news by mainstream media, to attack and attempt to de-legitimize President Trump. The obvious absence of veracity of the personal attacks against President Trump; American populism and American exceptionalism, should be bothersome to most Americans. Please take the time to consider the following observations.

Consider these points. American exceptionalism was under attack the first day Barack Obama assumed office and it remained under attack for the duration of his two terms. The attacks against American values, American history and American heritage, not to mention the US Constitution, were nothing new or exclusive to the Obama administration. However, the fervor with which they were pursued by Obama with the aid of the American media, had never been seen before in my observation of history.

Barack Obama's actions were nothing less than complicit with the goals and ideologies of America's enemies. In particular the Islamist of the world who have been waging war against this country for the last forty years. Obama's sympathies to Islam were blatant, unabashed and palpable for the duration of his presidency. And the results of that complicity, is plainly visible in the history of the eight years of the Obama presidency. As it is evident in our lives today.

Sixteen years ago, America suffered the worst attack on this nation and its people, since the attack at Pearl Harbor in 1941. Yet what do we see occurring in America every day now. Aside from the bowing and scraping of our former president to Islam, we now see Islam and its followers elevated to positions of greater value and concern than our own people. Sixteen years after 9/11? We saw the Muslim call to prayer broadcast in Times Square this week and celebrated by the media. Diversity once again trumps American exceptionalism.

Barack Obama wasn't individually or exclusively responsible for the fundamental changes that he promised and brought to America during his presidency. Equally complicit and far more damaging to this nation, has been the complicity of the American mainstream media and those other elected representatives in both parties. Those representatives we entrusted with our nation and its future have betrayed us. But never so much as what Thomas Jefferson knew as the press.

Not since the days of the Vietnam war, when the American media first realized their power and influence in shaping American public opinion, have the institutions and principles of this nation suffered from such a prolonged and purposefully orchestrated attack on our values and culture as a nation.  If you do not believe that the American media is complicit with those intent on the destruction of this nation, then please take the time to read the following. I promise it will be an eye opener to those unfamiliar.

in 1995 the Wall Street Journal published an interview with retired Vietnamese General Bui Tin.  Here was a man who served on the general staff of the North Vietnamese army during the Vietnam war. In an exchange during that 1995 interview, the following exchange occurred between the Wall Street Journal reporter and Gen. Bui Tin:

Q: How did Hanoi intend to defeat the Americans?

A: By fighting a long war which would break their will to help South Vietnam. Ho Chi Minh said, “We don’t need to win military victories, we only need to hit them until they give up and get out.”

Q: Was the American antiwar movement important to Hanoi’s victory?

A: It was essential to our strategy. Support for the war from our rear was completely secure while the American rear was vulnerable. Every day our leadership would listen to world news over the radio at 9 a.m. to follow the growth of the American antiwar movement. Visits to Hanoi by people like Jane Fonda and former Attorney General Ramsey Clark and ministers gave us confidence that we should hold on in the face of battlefield reverses. We were elated when Jane Fonda, wearing a red Vietnamese dress, said at a press conference that she was ashamed of American actions in the war and that she would struggle along with us.

Q: Did the Politburo pay attention to these visits?

A: Keenly

Q: Why?

A: Those people represented the conscience of America. The conscience of America was part of its war-making capability, and we were turning that power in our favor. America lost because of its democracy; through dissent and protest it lost the ability to mobilize a will to win.

Q: What else?

A: We had the impression that American commanders had their hands tied by political factors. Your generals could never deploy a maximum force for greatest military effect.

Those are the words of a man who was there. He lived the war from the Vietnamese side and he both heard and saw the results of American media influence in that war. Influence that he related to the reporter as the overwhelming factor in deciding the outcome. Think about that and then think about the present day. Particularly, the present day American media. Do you think anything has changed with the American media approach since Vietnam? The American mainstream media remains at the center of all things anti American to this day, and they relish their ability to assert their version of what American values are and ought to be on a daily basis.

Never forget, the altruism of the American media? Has a devious and surreptitious purpose. And that purpose is to undermine this nation for the benefit of those who would destroy us.The American media long ago forfeited its mantle of responsibility to the American media. They abandoned their sacred duty and they sold this nation into the bonds of evil. 

Re-read the words of Gen. Bui Tin and think about then and now and ask yourself if anything has changed. And if so? For better or for worse for this nation. And had the American media influenced those changes?

A Primer on Why We Lost Vietnam : A Vietnamese general confirms the anti-war movement's role in the U.S. defeat.

Consider the words of Thomas Jefferson as it concerned the press and what it should be.And what it should not be.

"The only security of all is in a free press. The force of public opinion cannot be resisted when permitted freely to be expressed. The agitation it produces must be submitted to. It is necessary, to keep the waters pure." --Thomas Jefferson to Lafayette, 1823.

So ask yourself.  Is the present American media truly a free press? Are they interested in keeping the waters pure?  Are they of the people and is their influence freely expressed on behalf of the people?  Or has their influence been morphed into an alien creation of politique and egalitarian controlled propaganda?

"The functionaries of every government have propensities to command at will the liberty and property of their constituents. There is no safe deposit for these but with the people themselves, nor can they be safe with them without information. Where the press is free, and every man able to read, all is safe." --Thomas Jefferson to Charles Yancey, 1816.

Where the press is free?  Is the American press truly free?  Or is it a tainted, influenced and controlled entity that no longer resembles or represents freedom? 

And lastly:

"The most effectual engines for [pacifying a nation] are the public papers... [A despotic] government always [keeps] a kind of standing army of newswriters who, without any regard to truth or to what should be like truth, [invent] and put into the papers whatever might serve the ministers. This suffices with the mass of the people who have no means of distinguishing the false from the true paragraphs of a newspaper." --Thomas Jefferson to G. K. van Hogendorp, Oct. 13, 1785.

So the issue at hand is fake news.  And who is creating and controlling it.  I for one know that it is not being controlled by any single individual or despotic government.  It is however being controlled?  By a shadow government.  The same shadow government that saw Barack Obama elevated to the presidency. And the same shadow government that he now figures into as a primary leader.

Read about it for yourself and you decide. 

Thomas Jefferson on Politics & Government

The Headline Says Germans Exhausted Wtih Merkel

What makes these leftist organs of media think or believe different.  Just like with our own elections of last November, the leftist media in Europe, refuses to hustle anything but the meme, that Angela Merkel will easily cruise to re-election.

They should be asking themselves one question and apparently they now are. "Why in hell would the German people re-elect this woman?" After she has all but destroyed Germany as her compatriot Obama has done in America. 

The German people and the world fought a war 78 years ago?  Over the German's hatred of the Jews.  The Jews who had descended on Germany after WWI and did all in their power to disassociate themselves from the war ravaged and devastated German people, while attempting to capitalize on their misery. 

Is it any wonder that the hatred became palpable and an individual like Hitler answered their call.  If you look around today?  What is the difference between then and now?  The German people have been inundated with a thankless hoard of "refugees" from Muslim countries over the last five years. As have the Swedish and the Danes and most of Europe.

There will be a war. Count on it.  Only this time it will be a guerilla war. Door to door. house to house. Block to block. Because the enemy is within the gates. In my observation of history?  The failures of the 1920s and 1930s, were that the Jews who came to Germany did not seek to become Germans or assimilate. This is what caused the hatred and the anti-Semitic fervor and the Holocaust.

Those who fail to learn from history?  Are condemned to repeat it.  Or so they say.  After a seventy five year re-wind?  I say history is about to repeat itself and Angela Merkel and the others can thank themselves for the evil they have imported and unleashed upon their people.

There will be a war. An end times war. For it has been foretold and we are upon the threshold.

Merkel Might Lose After All

Michael Flynn. The First To Fall. There Will Be More

 

 

Did you learn anything from the sudden forced resignation of National Security Advisor Michael Flynn... Maybe you should have. Maybe you should have learned? That there were two points of observation. First, that his demise was the result of a political assassination. An assassination orchestrated by the US intelligence community. Specifically, the NSA.

But more importantly? You should be aware now of how this all happened and how it all came to be revealed. It's pretty simple really. General Flynn was wiretapped. They wire tapped his phone calls from the minute his name surfaced in the Trump administration. And when they came across the phone call he had with the Russian ambassador to the Untied States? A phone call they obviously monitored and taped? They began raking through the conversation. They began looking for anything they could cherry pick. Anything that they could mine and weaponize to drive Flynn from office and make President Trump look bad. And they succeeded.

Wire tapping? Is that what I said? Yes it is. But that's illegal isn't it? Well I am glad you asked. Because as a matter of fact? It isn't illegal. Not for the NSA and the intelligence community at least. They can and have been wire tapping the entire country for a number of years. Every since the post 9/11 era and the creation of Homeland Security and the sundry Homeland Security and intelligence and legislative acts that have been passed Since then. Each act authorizing them to do more to disregard the constitution and and yes, allowing them to wire tap every conversation in this country since then.

How could that be? There are literally millions and millions of phone conversations in this country everyday! Not to mention the tens of millions of emails and social media posts? How in hell could they do that? It would be impossible! Right? Ever heard of computers? And Terabyte drives? And the scanning, skimming and sourcing of digital information? Or the myriad of bots that are intricately woven into every aspect of your turned on, connected and digital world?

Well I hate to break it to you, but yes. You too have been hacked and spied on and wired tapped and surveilled. Even this blog post will be viewed and catalogued and filed away. Just in case I ever attain any influence, political or otherwise where it could be utilized against me.

So yes. As Paul Harvey would say...."the rest of the story?" Is that General Flynn was taken down by his own words. Conveniently collected, via a national network of surreptitious spying on everyone. Everyone except the chosen elites of course. Like the shadow government our most recent president is now secretly leading in the background.

Shadow government? Oh! yes.... Its there and it was put into place before he ever left office. And so were the expanded powers of the NSA. Powers that allow them to spy on everyone and share the information amongst all of their sister agencies. They can spy on anybody. Including the president of the United States. Any of this becoming clearer yet?

Remember the phone calls to the Australian PM and the President of Mexico that President Trump made his second week in office? Remember how those private conversations were immediately leaked to the media? How'd that happen? Who had access to private presidential phone calls? Makes you wonder don't it? Who had the transcripts and how did they get them? Is the reality beginning to congeal yet?

See how the mechanism works? The mechanism left in place by the Obama administration and the globalist and their embedded moles in every department of the federal government and the media?

Want to drain the swamp President Trump? Well the slime and the amphibians and the feces generating parasites that exist there comfortably might have something to say about that. And they already have.

I made the observation that Hillary Clinton and the democrats must have learned one thing from the Wikileaks exposure. And that one thing is to never utilize emails again. Utilizing flash paper and couriers is about all there is left as far as security in today's world for anyone hoping to maintain any level of secrecy or privacy. And the thought of keeping records is absurd, except for these intelligence agencies who now gather and keep records on everything and everyone.

The democrats and the leftist and the globalist, have taken their own recent political scandals and injuries and awakening? To formulate and implement their new game plan to create and manage their shadow government against Donald Trump and all the chumps who supported him an voted for him.

William Shakespeare's Julius Caesar said: "Cry 'Havoc!', and let slip the dogs of war". The dogs of war have been loosed. "Havoc" was a word used in the middle ages by French & English armies to give soldiers permission to loot & plunder. Make no mistake. Havoc has been cried and these dogs have been let loose on all of us. To loot and plunder our lives and our thoughts and our privacy.

But take heart. You and I are neither unique or special. This new war applies to one and all. And one in particular. And his name is Donald Trump. And if I were him? I'd hire the best counter surveillance experts in the world? And I would hold weekly staff and cabinet meetings at my own private kingdom. I'd fly them all down to Mar a Lago and I'd implement my own security? Security that would rival the Bilderbergs.

Because its only going to get more intense and more vicious as the days and weeks pass.

The Political Assassination of Michael Flynn

The Demise of Michael Flynn

I am always amazed to watch politics in America and the media coverage of disparate faux pas.  Let the left and the democrats get caught lying about anything?  And suddenly they have misspoken. Or used a poor choice of words.  There never was any intent to mislead congress or the America people. 

Yet allow the same facts to evolve around a republican? And he is evil incarnate and must be purged and publicly driven and hunted to the ground.  And the media revels in both pursuits.  They will blindly defend democrat wrong doing, while taking the greatest of exceptions to anything done by a republican.

The bottom line for me is this. Mike Flynn lied to the vice president about his phone call to the Russian ambassador.  That in and of itself is a fireable offense in my book. And should be.  Now?  The democrats can pursue their cries for an investigation of the Trump administration and what they knew and when they knew it. But that makes little difference to me.  The president has done the right thing.  The same thing that should have been done by hos predecessor on a number of occasions in his own staff.

Meanwhile, the president and his staff can pursue who the leaker/s were? But they would be better served to just get rid of them .There is no need to reveal the identity of career leftist moles in the NSA and CIA. Just fire them and be done with it.  And do not expect any help from the media about it period. 

The president needs to call a staff meeting with his staff and cabinet members today and reinterate the ground rules.  Rule #1?  You all have targets on your backs as do I. And they will stop at no means to get to you, to get to me. Honesty and integrity are all we have. We certainly don't have any friends in congress or in the media.  Therefore, the trust of the American people is paramount.  They are the one's who elected me and they are the one's I will ultimately be made to answer to. If you do anything to jeopardize that relationship, You will be gone and fast.

New York Times Reporter Reprimanded for "Hooker" Comment About Melania Trump

The comment became public knowledge on Monday after supermodel Emily Ratajkowski stated that she heard what was said and was outraged over it.

Yes, the New York Times has a reporter referring to the first lady as a hooker. Now ask yourself what would have been the response if a Fox News reporter had of referred to Michelle Obama as a hooker.

Link to story

Mainstream media whines as Trump calls on less established news outlets

More pissing and moaning by the mainstream media.  They are upset that the president hasn't treated them fairly.  Which is laughable. 

The mainstream media isn’t liking the new set up at the White House: Lesser name news outlets are being called on during press briefings, rather than the old, established bellwethers.
During his press conference with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, President Donald Trump called on two news outlets: WJLA a local ABC news affiliate, and the Daily Caller. Both failed to ask him about the fate of his national security adviser Gen. Michael Flynn, who has been marred in a controversy that he spoke to Russian authorities before Mr. Trump took office.
And the mainstream media immediately pounced – saying Mr. Trump was picking favorites in order to avoid questioning on Mr. Flynn. 

The Washington Times

Grammys producer wants stars to be political during speeches

So...the Grammys intends to make it a complete political night.  Sorry I will miss it.  I haven't watched the show in over 30 years.  You might say?  The day the music died.  Back when they began their political treatises and forgot about real music and real fans.

And this is nothing more than same shit, different day times ten. Just as I said it would be when Donald Trump was elected.  What will be accomplished?  What is being accomplished?  Its that the democrat party is further factionalizing and radicalizing to the point that come 2020?  All the left will have will be the rabid radicals to rely on.  That and their memories of so called glory.  If we have not collapsed into complete civil war by then.  Because that is precisely where this country is and where the left is taking us.

http://pagesix.com/2017/02/11/grammys-producer-says-political-acceptance-speeches-welcome/?_ga=1.186887976.1269764977.1486907558

What Is The Definition Of Racism

Racist and racism seem to have risen to the top of the most frequented vitriolic accusations of those defending leftist egalitarian principles in America today. If you don't agree with their leftist positions completely, immediately and on every level? Well you are obviously a racist and a myriad of other qualifiers.

You can be a bigot too and most certainly a xenophobe and sexist and misogynist and anti LGBTQIA. But those all come later. You must understand first and always and most importantly, that you are a racist. So I decided to revisit the word and see specifically what the definition was, that overwhelmingly qualified myself and others to be branded as racists. I mean, aside from the fact that I am not black and by virtue of that reality? I most certainly must be a racist, based upon all I am being told by the media and the world of academia.

So I went directly to the oldest accepted source of word-ology and word-smithing and root definitions of American English words. And this is what I found. ~Merriam Websters~ Definition of racism 1 : a belief that race is the primary determinant of human traits and capacities and that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race 2 a : a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles b : a political or social system founded on racism 3 : racial prejudice or discrimination So there it is.

The definition. And as such, by definition? A definition is the guidepost of determination of applicability for any word in popular use today. I was immediately drawn to this "wording" in the definition by Webster's. "that racial differences produce an inherent superiority of a particular race." A belief that racial differences? produce inherent superiority of a particular race? Is that what that just said? I thought so.

Therefore, by definition? Anyone who represents any race solely to the superiority of any other race? Is by definition a racist. There is no other way it could possibly be. Right? Then there is this further definition. Racism is: "a doctrine or political program based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles." So in other words? When you create a doctrine or political movement? That solely represents one race? Based on the assumption of racism and designed to execute its principles? You might be a racist.

Jeff Foxworthy made a career on the premise that "you might be a redneck if." So, if I or anyone else were to flip that premise? And declare that you might be a racist if? Even as humorous satire? It might be funny huh.... Well, unless I used the tag to describe the actions of some black people and their supporters. If I were to do that? With nothing other than satire involved or intended. Just plain simple truth? It still would not matter. Because it would still be me and me only who was being declared the racist. But back to the question of what and who exactly is a racist. So I look at the definition and I look around at all of the vitriolic usage of the word today, after which one conclusion remains clear to me. There is language and there are words? Words have become more of what people want them to be, and more than what those words truly are or were ever intended to be.

There are words that have been in usage and clearly defined for years. However, are we truly expected to believe those definitions and adhere to those word usages today? Particularly when those words have been weaponized? That's right. I said weaponized. You see, it's like this in the real world of contemporary American egalitarianism today. A pointy stick? Is just a pointy stick. Until you jab someone in the eye with it. There is no need of determination of intent once the act has been completed. The person who became the target of the pointy stick has suffered the injury. And in most instances it is easily determined that the intent of the person using the pointy stick was to injure or maim the intended victim.

Therefore, when injury is the intent? It makes no difference if the weapon of choice is a pointy stick, or a nuclear weapon. Or if the weapon of choice is words. So yes. We as a nation? Have allowed our language to become weaponized. Words that existed with clear definition, intent and understanding for centuries, have been co-opted and re-tooled and re-defined into the desired images of weapons. Weapons of class, weapons of sexuality and yes, weapons of race. And those words are used daily as weapons and at every level of our society. And the really unique reality to all of this? Is not that you just learned something from reading this. The unique reality is that you have never allowed yourself the ability to understand what has happened or why.

The truly unique reality is that you have known all along and you have allowed these weaponized words to shape and mold your own individual reality and your own interactions in society. You and many others in America have been in a race to outdistance and separate yourselves from race and being declared a racist at all costs. You have been taught to be ashamed of your own race. For it is you who are white. It is you who are dirty. It is you who are a racist. It is you who are a supremacist. It is you who are such a racist? That you don't even recognize being a racist. Your racism is ingrained in you and in the very fabric of your racial existence and the racial existence of every other white person in America. To the extent that you do not know that it exists. Or so the popularized meme goes.

All you have to do is look around. The evidence is there. Right before your eyes. Conveniently provided by those who know best, a racist when they see one. Which just happens to be a simple litmus test for them. Are you white? Then you must be a racist and you must be the benefactor and beneficiary of white privilege. See how simple that was? Oh yeah, Almost forgot. Forget about that Webster's word definition and all the other word definitions for racist and racism. Those words have been weaponized. Remember?

Just like all the other words. They no longer mean what they mean, they mean what those who use them want them to mean. And you have absolutely no say so in the matter and if you even attempt to defend yourself from the accusations of racism or any of the other weaponized words being use to DE-legitiize you? You must be a racist. So remember this. All you need to know about the word racist? Is that you need to flee from it and distance yourself from it and immediately bow and cow tow to all people of color. Better to do that than be declared a racist. Right?

Why? Because you are a racist and you have already been recognized and identified for precisely who and what you are by all others who are not white. You are the enemy. You are to be marginalized, DE-legitimized and culled from all levels of descent society. So simply slide away while you can. Stay low. Stay quiet.  Give the floor and the stage and the nation to those who know better. Because after all? That's what they have been taught and that is what they are being taught by the schools and universities and the media at all levels of our existence in America today.

And whatever you do? Don't examine the premise of black lives matter. Because the truth and the reality is greater in its individual representations by media, than it is or ever will be in the whole truth of its existence. Their truth says black lives matters? Their truth is that it truly is a movement and philosophy of premise. A movement that exists solely in the reality that black lives matter. Just keep in mind that their truths are not lies? Just yours.

Why? Because they have weaponized the words of race and racism. Therefore, any thought or rebuttal contrary to their reality that you might attempt to represent? Well that's just racist on its surface. Got that? I thought you would. So even though every representation of the BLM organization screams the truth. Which is that black lies matter more than what the truth or reality says. And their lives (lies) matter more so than any truth you will ever attempt to counter them with. Many years ago, someone coined the phrase: "its a black thing and you wouldn't understand it." And they were right.

Dear White People - Netflix “Black Revenge” Fantasy Series

Watch the video and you decide.

Judge’s blocking of travel ban sets stage for epic court battle

A federal appeals court on Thursday unanimously upheld a judge’s order that slammed the brakes on President Trump’s temporary refugee and immigration ban.
Well there you have it. The three judge panel, one republican appointed judge and two democrat appointed judges, "rule unanimously," to uphold the blocking of President Trump's immigration ban. Just as many have predicted they would.  Which leaves the Supreme Court. And if the Trump administration decides to try and take it to the Supreme Court before the confirmation of Trump's appointed justice?  He will lose again. 

Its not about the law or legality or if its constitutional. All reasonable legal scholars have already said that his executive order is legal and constitutional.  Therefore, this judge who blocked itand the 9th circuit today? Are simply playing activist politics. 

To the detriment of the American people and to the benefit of our enemies.

http://nypost.com/2017/02/09/federal-appeals-court-rules-against-trumps-travel-ban/

Exclusive: Syria’s Assad tells Yahoo News some refugees are ‘definitely’ terrorists

 Weighing in on one of the most contentious issues in American politics — the danger posed to host countries by the 4.8 million people who have fled from Syria’s civil war — Syrian President Bashar Assad told Yahoo News that some of the refugees are “definitely” terrorists.

What more proof is needed.... Yet once again. The 9th circuit court of appeals in the land of fruit and nuts? Ruled to uphold the renegade judge and refused to uphold the constitutional protected right of the president to make and set immigration law. 

Even the most liberal Harvard law professor, Alan Dershwitz has agreed that President Trump's executive order is constitutional and legal.  So now what?  Take it to the Supreme Court?  Before the appointed justice can be confirmed?  That will be stupid.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/exclusive-syrias-assad-tells-yahoo-news-some-refugees-are-definitely-terrorists-182401926.html

A MANIAC IS RUNNING OUR FOREIGN POLICY! (IT'S NOT TRUMP)

http://www.anncoulter.com/columns/2017-02-08.html

Another good read by the woman who rightly predicted Donald Trump would be elected president and was laughed at.

If only we were able to deport citizens, we could use Trump's new policy of excluding those who are "hostile" toward our country to get rid of Judge James Robart.

Judge Robart's veto of Trump's travel ban notwithstanding, there is not the slightest question but that the president, in his sole discretion, can choose to admit or exclude any foreigners he likes, based on "the interests of the United States.”

The Clinton administration used the executive branch's broad power over immigration to send a 6-year-old boy back to a communist dictatorship. The courts were completely powerless to stop him.

Seattle Being Bought Up By The Chinese

"When Anna Riley, a Seattle-area real-estate agent, held an open house for a new $2.3 million listing in the tony city of Bellevue late last month, the pool of prospective buyers was different from the usual assortment of tech magnates, sports stars and chief executives.
Twenty groups of buyers visited the property in the Seattle metro area—and all of them were Chinese."

So..when the Chinese come to strike America?  Will they hit Seattle?  Probably not. They won't want to create collateral damage or lower the value of their real estate. Just thinking.

 https://www.wsj.com/articles/for-chinese-home-buyers-seattle-is-the-new-vancouver-1486500393

Are We Ready For Another War In Europe?

So as the band plays on and the democrats continue to drag their feet and play politics over why President Trump won't condemn Vladimir Putin?  Looks like our NATO Allies are doing all they can to further exasperate the mess that Obama left behind.  They are basically baiting Putin and relying on America to back their play.

Back during Vietnam?  The leftist hippies use to say: " What if they had a war? And nobody came?"
I say: "What if the Europeans invite another war?  And America doesn't come running to bail them out this time?" 



If they piss Putin off enough? He will press the advantages that Obama gave him, politically and militarily. And he will take another slice of Europe.  Just like Hitler did.  Only this time?  I don't believe the American president will volunteer Americans to die over Europeans arrogance and stupidity.

Call it cozying up to Putin if you like, but Trump won't allow America to be drawn in. We have far greater worries and concerns with the Chinese on the other side of the planet.


Minister Sergey Shoigu said: "As part of a snap combat readiness check of the Aerospace Force, units of the Aerospace Force’s antiaircraft missile and radio-technical troops have arrived at the designated areas," TASS reported.
"Upon their arrival at the new positions, the crews of radar stations, S-300 and S-400 antiaircraft missile systems carried out maintenance work on their military hardware and went on combat alert.
"As the combat crews of radar stations and antiaircraft missile systems detect unidentified aerial targets, air defense patrol fighter jets will be scrambled to classify them or notionally destroy them."


https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/2815150/vladimir-putin-orders-russian-air-force-to-be-prepared-to-launch-attacks-at-any-minute-as-fears-over-world-war-iii-continue-to-grow/

The Iranians Give America The Finger Once Again

"Iran launched another missile Wednesday from the same launch pad east of Tehran where it conducted a previous ballistic missile test last month, an official told Fox News."

So what about this is a surprise to anyone? Those with good sense said over a year ago, when Obama was signing his meaningless nuclear treaty with Iran, that they would not abide by it. And they haven't  And now? They are pushing all the buttons and begging for a response.  But don't worry. President Trump won't be baited into it and he won't respond.

Netanyahu and Israel will and soon. Count on it.

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2017/02/08/iran-fires-another-missile-from-launch-pad-us-official-says.html