Friday, November 20, 2020

And Justice For All? Not Quite. 🤔

 So.  How many times have you seen a news conference after a major arrest or a major investigation?  And the media is badgering the authorities for information and evidence. 

And the answer is always the same. The evidence will be revealed in a court of law. It is not the purview of and investigative agency? To placate media hounds with evidentiary information that will prove critical to prosecuting the case. 

And the reason for that? Is that they do not want to taint the evidence, with any pre-trial release of information that could ultimately damage their case. 

So why does the media think or believe that they are entitled to see the evidence that the Trump attorney's have accumulated and are accumulating.  Concerning voter fraud Nd a stolen election. 

Next question. 

The department of justice and the FBI launched a major investigation concerning so called Russian collusion? On what they knew in advance was an unsubstantiated and previously proven false Steele dossier. 

They also knew that the dossier had been created and paid for by the DNC and the Clinton campaign, as purposeful disinformation, yet they went ahead with a criminal investigation anyway. An investigation that led to Falsified FISA warrants and illegal wire tapping by the FBI. And ultimately falsified charges against General Flynn and Roger Stone and others. 

An FBI investigation that led to a three year Mueller investigation, that cost over fifty million dollars. Combined with three separate congressional investigations.  Each of which found nothing. Other than provable criminal conduct and malfeasance by the FBI.  

Add to that?  An impeachment of the president? That was carried out on the basis of a so called "whistle blower?" Who alleged that the president offered a quid pro quo to the Ukrainian president during a phone call. And yet the whistle blower? Has never been officially identified or questioned.  And the impeachment failed on its face.  

Now fast forward to the present. 

The president's attorneys? Have several hundred "sworn affidavits," by individuals in several states, that have sworn that they witnessed inappropriate counting of ballots and the manipulation of votes to benefit Joe Biden. 

These sworn affidavits have attested to the facts that those swearing oaths, witnessed truck loads of pristine ballots, arriving at ballot counting stations in the middle of the night in Pennsylvania and Michigan.  

All of which were tabulated for Joe Biden. As the only vote cast on each ballot. And they have sworn in those affidavits, that there were no down ballot votes for any other candidate on these thousands of pristine ballots. 

So where is the FBI now.  Where are the congressional investigations into these sworn affidavits? By hundreds of whistle blowers. 

We have turned this nation upside down for four years over a proven false and bogus dossier, and ultimately due to the unattested to or sworn statement of an as of yet, never identified single whistle blower.  Yet now? With hundreds of whistle blowers and hard evidence proving election malfeasance, if not out right criminal conduct? The FBI and congress are silent. 

See the problem?  They do not care about evidence or official misconduct or criminality. All they do care about is forcing their preferred perspectives of Nothing to see here. Now ket us move along to the inauguration of Joe Biden as president. 

So, if you do not believe that a deep state exists? Or that this election was manipulated and stolen for Joe Biden? Guess again. And maybe contact your congressmen and senators? And ask them why the FBI has their head in the sand and their collective asses in the air? Ignoring hard evidence.  Evidence that literally screams for justice. 

The American people demand the truth. And we demand that those responsible for this corruption, be brought to justice. And we demand that our president be afforded due process of law and the constitutional provisions enumerated in the 12th and 14th amendment.

No comments: