Sunday, September 02, 2012

Balancing the budget is a bad idea.

 080512_fns_axelrod_640.jpg

Well of course it is!  The way to prosperity is through more taxation! More spending! And more government subsidized programs!  If anyone can look at David Axelrod and not see a crook and a shyster, then they are blind as a bat in my estimation.

This man betrays ever principle of humanism and Americanism and trades it all on the alter of secular humanism, socialism and an undying allegiance to egalitarianism and the hatred of America and what she stands for and represents.

After a week of withering attacks on President Obama's fiscal record, top Democrats on Sunday defended the president's plans for shaving down the deficit -- but said balancing the budget now would actually be a bad idea.
Senior campaign adviser David Axelrod, speaking on "Fox News Sunday," repeated claims that Obama's plan would cut the deficit by $4 trillion over the next decade, bringing  the budget shortfall down to a point that would "stabilize" the debt.
"And then, with growth, we'll be in a position to begin reducing it further," he said.
But, when pressed, Axelrod would not say when the president's plan could bring the budget into balance. With the deficit clocking in at more than $1 trillion once again this year, he suggested that's not the goal in the near-term.
"What's necessary is to stabilize the debt and then work from there," he said. "You can't balance the budget in the short term, because to do that would be to ratchet down the economy."

No comments: