Robert Gibbs announced yesterday that he was leaving his post as White House spokesman. Something that has been sorely needed IMO, but the question remains why now?

Perhaps this answers some of it.

I wondered yesterday whether Robert Gibbs jumped or was pushed and noted that President Barack Obama’s words indicated that it was “not an entirely voluntary departure”.

It’s being reported by John King on CNN right now that Gibbs wanted to be a presidential counsellor – something he’s been putting about for quite a while – but William Daley, the new chief of staff, nixed this because he believed that too many cooks would spoil the presidential broth. So that’s why Gibbs is out.

So, at least some in media (the UK media) believe the departure was the result of Obama's choice of Daley as his new chief of staff. The interesting part to me, is that the ultra left camp of the democrat party, is already off the reservation and blood red mad over Daley being chosen for the position to begin with.

Now if they perceive that his arrival has caused the departure of their favored arrogant mouth piece Gibbs? There could be hell to pay within the party once they figure out the other appointments looming on the horizon.

There are those who are arguing that Obama is moving toward the center, in order to attempt to salvage his 2012 re-election hopes. I disagree. I believe his re-election hopes are already past tense. I believe that the true reason behind his selection of the 'Chicagoland' crew, is no more complicated than simple payback to the New Party that got him elected.

Most Americans were oblivious and remain totally oblivious to the Chicago 'new party' influence over Obama and his campaign and his presidency. The New Socialist Party in Chicago would be a more accurate description. These are the one's most responsible for crafting candidate Obama for state office in Illinois and ultimately the US Senate and the White House. And now it is time to give the devil his due and pay back the investment.

Some (on the right) have proposed that Obama was the "Manchurian Candidate." Pre-programmed to slip in under the radar and achieve that which could only be achieved from the inside of the mechanism. I would argue, that they weren't too far off the mark. The only problem being, Obama was never created and designed to simply counter the right or conservatism in America. He was designed and created to counter it all. And how better to accomplish that, than for the left to give him the keys to the kingdom. All the while believing that they had elected a "progressive" just like themselves, until he began activating his real agenda. (kinda like now).

Guess again folks Obama is no progressive. No where near in my estimation. At best, he is a Fabian Socialist and at worst, he is the living effigy of a communist Manchurian candidate who has achieved the ultimate deep cover implantation. Someone crafted by those who specifically sought the ignorant complicitness of the liberal left in gaining access to the inner workings of this country. 

The left never saw it coming and even now they are madly pushing all the buttons trying to reclaim control of "the one" who promised such a glorious new age for liberals.  But as each day passes, they are realizing more and more, that they are not in control. They never really have been.

The scraps being thrown from the table, are parts of the larger plan of destroying America. DADT being the most recent example. And before they are through, they will move to push through a federal provision that circumvents states efforts to prevent homosexual marriages. All part of the plan. But the one's who have bee truly duped are those in the democrat party who actually thought that their messiah had risen. Obama is no messiah and he is not the anti Christ, but he will serve the purpose of America's enemies until the real one arrives.