Wednesday, October 05, 2011

$50,000 X how much?

Harry Reid's liberal faction and their latest pipe dream of taxation. Via FOX News
Senate Democrats are considering a surtax on millionaires to offset the cost of President Barack Obama's $445 billion jobs bill, according to several party aides. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., outlined plans for a 5 percent surcharge in a closed-door meeting with the rank and file, according to participants, as Obama traveled to Texas to deliver his most caustic challenge yet to House Republicans who have not allowed a vote on the legislation unveiled nearly a month ago
OK, so there is the proposition, so let's do the math. 5% of $!,000,000 equals $50,000 So how many millionaires does it take to generate enough money to pay for the $445 billion in Obama's latest tax and spend scheme? Well, that depends on what the definition of millionaire is.

Or is it as Bill Clinton once said: "that depends on what the definition of is, is."

According to Wikipedia quick reference, there are roughly 16.5 million millionaires currently living in America. Which actually means, there are that many people who have assets equal to or exceeding $1,000,000 So, is it Harry Reid's plan to tax people based solely upon their net worth? Or does he intend to tax only those actually earning $1.000.000 annually? Let's work with the former as a starting point.

Doing the math, 5% of $1,000,000 equals $50,000

Multiplied by 16.500.000 and the answer is? 830 000 000 000 (That would be 830 Billion)

So on the surface, that would give Harry and his thugs an almost 100% surplus in increased taxation in one year alone. After they theoretically paid for Obama's dream world jobs bill, they would have a surplus of over 400 billion. So I wonder..

Would that one time hit be good enough for them? Or would they want to spend that extra 400 billion they bled off the prosperous, to pay for more of their so called bills and programs? And how many want to bet that once they got their hands on the first bucket of gold, that they would want more and more and more? Every year endlessly.

I have an idea. What say we pass a bill that allows all alcoholics to simply go to their local liquor store and take five percent of the inventory annually. That should be a sure fire way to end alcoholism. Don't cha think?

No comments: